Effect of atorvastatin on C-reactive protein and benefits for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: analyses from the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Trial

Aims/hypothesis We investigated whether atorvastatin 10 mg daily lowered C-reactive protein (CRP) and whether the effects of atorvastatin on cardiovascular disease (CVD) varied by achieved levels of CRP and LDL-cholesterol. Methods CRP levels were measured at baseline and 1 year after randomisation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetologia 2015-07, Vol.58 (7), p.1494-1502
Hauptverfasser: Soedamah-Muthu, Sabita S., Livingstone, Shona J., Charlton-Menys, Valentine, Betteridge, D. John, Hitman, Graham A., Neil, H. Andrew W., Bao, Weihang, DeMicco, David A., Preston, Gregory M., Fuller, John H., Stehouwer, Coen D. A., Schalkwijk, Casper G., Durrington, Paul N., Colhoun, Helen M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims/hypothesis We investigated whether atorvastatin 10 mg daily lowered C-reactive protein (CRP) and whether the effects of atorvastatin on cardiovascular disease (CVD) varied by achieved levels of CRP and LDL-cholesterol. Methods CRP levels were measured at baseline and 1 year after randomisation to atorvastatin in 2,322 patients with type 2 diabetes (40–75 years, 69% males) in a secondary analysis of the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study, a randomised placebo-controlled trial. We used Cox regression models to test the effects on subsequent CVD events ( n  = 147) of CRP and LDL-cholesterol lowering at 1 year. Results After 1 year, the atorvastatin arm showed a net CRP lowering of 32% (95% CI −40%, −22%) compared with placebo. The CRP response was highly variable, with 45% of those on atorvastatin having no decrease in CRP (median [interquartile range, IQR] per cent change −9.8% [−57%, 115%]). The LDL-cholesterol response was less variable, with a median (IQR) within-person per cent change of −41% (−51%, −31%). Baseline CRP did not predict CVD over 3.8 years of follow-up (HR per SD log 0.89 [95% CI 0.75, 1.06]), whereas baseline LDL-cholesterol predicted CVD (HR per SD 1.21 [95% CI 1.02, 1.44]), as did on-treatment LDL-cholesterol. There was no significant difference in the reduction in CVD by atorvastatin, with above median (HR 0.57) or below median (HR 0.52) change in CRP or change in LDL-cholesterol (HR 0.61 vs 0.50). Conclusions/interpretation CRP was not a strong predictor of CVD. Statin efficacy did not vary with achieved CRP despite considerable variability in CRP response. The use of CRP as an indicator of efficacy of statin therapy on CVD risk in patients with type 2 diabetes is not supported by these data. Trial registration NCT00327418
ISSN:0012-186X
1432-0428
DOI:10.1007/s00125-015-3586-8