Life cycle assessment of routinely used endoscopic instruments and simple intervention to reduce our environmental impact
[EN] Objectives GI endoscopy units represent the third largest producers of medical waste. We aimed to determine endoscopic instrument composition and life cycle assessment (LCA) and to assess a sustainability proposal based on a mark on the instruments that identifies parts can be safely recycled o...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [EN] Objectives GI endoscopy units represent the third
largest producers of medical waste. We aimed to
determine endoscopic instrument composition and life
cycle assessment (LCA) and to assess a sustainability
proposal based on a mark on the instruments that
identifies parts can be safely recycled or ¿green mark¿.
Design Material composition analysis and LCA
of forceps, snares and clips from four different
manufacturers (A¿D) were performed with four
different methods. Carbon footprint from production,
transportation and end of life of these instruments was
calculated. In 30 consecutive procedures, we marked the
contact point with the working channel. 5 cm away from
that point was considered as green mark. One-week
prospective study was conducted with 184 procedures
evaluating 143 instruments (75 forceps, 49 snares and
19 haemoclips) to assess the efficacy of this recyclable
mark.
Results Composition from different manufacturers
varied widely. Most common materials were high
global warming potential (GWP) waste (polyethylene,
polypropylene and acrylonitrile) and low GWP waste
(stainless steel). Significant differences were found for
the forceps (0.31¿0.47 kg of CO2
equivalent (CO2
-eq))
and haemoclips (0.41¿0.57 kg CO2
-eq) between the
manufacturers. Green mark was established 131.26 cm
for gastroscope and 195.32 cm for colonoscope. Oneweek activity produced 67.74 kg CO2
-eq. Applying
our sustainability intervention, we could reduce up to
27.44% (18.26 kg CO2
-eq). This allows the recycling of
61.7% of the instrument total weight (4.69 kg).
Conclusion Knowledge of carbon footprint is crucial
to select the most sustainable alternatives because there
are large variations between brands. A mark to identify
recyclable parts could reduce our environmental impact
significantly.
López-Muñoz, P.; Martín-Cabezuelo, R.; Lorenzo-Zúñiga, V.; Vilariño-Feltrer, G.; Tort-Ausina, I.; Vidaurre, A.; Pons Beltrán, V. (2023). Life cycle assessment of routinely used endoscopic instruments and simple intervention to reduce our environmental impact. Gut. 72(9):1692-1697. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329544 |
---|