Possible substantive improvements in the structure of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale? A study based on its Spanish version

[EN] Purpose Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale is one of the most commonly used and validated measures to assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in this population. However, there are some aspects related to its structure that still deserve consideration. The aim of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Andreu Vaillo, Yolanda, Conchado Peiró, Andrea, Martinez Lopez, Paula, Martinez Martinez, María Teresa, Moreno, Pilar, Arribas Alpuente, Leoncio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[EN] Purpose Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale is one of the most commonly used and validated measures to assess the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in this population. However, there are some aspects related to its structure that still deserve consideration. The aim of this study was to test the substantive improvement over the original QLACS structure resulting from several proposals reflected in the literature. Method Using a cross-sectional design and Confirmatory Factorial Analysis, we explored those proposals. Reliability, convergent validity, and factor invariance across three cancer survivorships phases (re-entry, early, and long term) were also analyzed. 1.862 post-treatment survivors of diverse cancer types completed the Spanish versions of QLACS, Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18), and Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS). Results The original model with twelve domains, grouped (with the exception of benefits) into a single total score, versus two subtotal (Generic and Cancer-specific) obtained a good fit. The values of Cronbach's alpha, Composite reliability, Average Variance Extracted indexes, and Pearson correlations supported the internal consistency and temporal stability (interval of 2-3 weeks) of the QLACS. Results also showed its adequate convergent validity and an invariant factor structure across survival periods (re-entry survivorship, early survivorship, long-term survivorship). Conclusion In its original structure, albeit the replacement of the scores on the two subscales by a total score, our results support QLACS as a valid and useful tool for the assessment of HRQoL in post-treatment cancer survivors throughout the different survival phases. No funding was received for conducting this study. This work was supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. Government of Spain [grant number PSI2013-45,905-R. Andreu Vaillo, Y.; Conchado Peiró, A.; Martinez Lopez, P.; Martinez Martinez, MT.; Moreno, P.; Arribas Alpuente, L. (2022). Possible substantive improvements in the structure of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) scale? A study based on its Spanish version. Quality of Life Research. 31(6):1871-1881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03036-4 Admiraal, J. M., Hoekstra-Weebers, J. E. H. M., Schröder, C. P., Tuinier, W., Hospers, G. A. P., & Reyners, A. K. L. (2020). Distress, problems, referral wish, and supportive health care use in breast cancer survivors beyond the first year