Validez actual del diagnóstico de estado vegetativo permanente : estudio longitudinal en una muestra clínica de pacientes en estado alterado de conciencia

[EN] Introduction Altered states of consciousness have traditionally been associated with poor prognosis. At present, clinical differences between these entities are beginning to be established. Method Our study included 37 patients diagnosed with vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Noé -Sebastián, Enrique, Olaya, José, Colomer Font, Carolina, Moliner, Belén, Ugart, Patricia, Llorens Rodríguez, Roberto, Rodríguez -Sánchez-Leiva, Clara, Ferri Campos, Joan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[EN] Introduction Altered states of consciousness have traditionally been associated with poor prognosis. At present, clinical differences between these entities are beginning to be established. Method Our study included 37 patients diagnosed with vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and 43 in a minimally conscious state (MCS) according to the Coma Recovery Scale¿Revised (CRS-R). All patients were followed up each month for at least 6 months using the CRS-R. We recorded the time points when vegetative state progressed from `persistent¿ to `permanent¿ based on the cut-off points established by the Multi-Society-Task-Force: 12 months in patients with traumatic injury and 3 months in those with non-traumatic injury. A logistic regression model was used to determine the factors potentially predicting which patients will emerge from MCS. Results In the UWS group, 23 patients emerged from UWS but only 9 emerged from MCS. Of the 43 patients in the MCS group, 26 patients emerged from that state during follow-up. Eight of the 23 patients (34.7%) who emerged from UWS and 17 of the 35 (48.6%) who emerged from MCS recovered after the time points proposed by the Multi-Society-Task-Force. According to the multivariate regression analysis, aetiology (P < .01), chronicity (P = .01), and CRS-R scores at admission (P < .001) correctly predicted emergence from MCS in 77.5% of the cases. Conclusions UWS and MCS are different clinical entities in terms of diagnosis and outcomes. Some of the factors traditionally associated with poor prognosis, such as time from injury and likelihood of recovery, should be revaluated. [ES] Introducción Los estados alterados de conciencia han sido considerados tradicionalmente como cuadros clínicos de pronóstico infausto. En la actualidad, sabemos que dichos estados engloban distintas entidades clínicas cuyo perfil diferencial empieza a reconocerse. Método Se incluyeron 37 pacientes con el diagnóstico de estado vegetativo o síndrome de vigilia sin respuesta (SVSR) y 43 en estado de mínima conciencia (EMC) de acuerdo con la Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Todos los pacientes fueron evaluados mensualmente con la CRS-R durante al menos 6 meses. Se evaluó el momento de superar cada estado considerando los puntos de corte de «irreversibilidad» (12 meses para los casos de origen traumático y 3 para los no traumáticos), tradicionalmente establecidos por la Multi-Society-Task-Force. Se empleó un modelo de regresión logística par