Infant Group B Streptococcal Disease Incidence and Serotypes Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses
Background: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) remains a leading cause of neonatal sepsis in high-income contexts, despite declines due to intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). Recent evidence suggests higher incidence in Africa, where IAP is rare. We investigated the global incidence of infant invasiv...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) remains a leading cause
of neonatal sepsis in high-income contexts, despite declines due
to intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). Recent evidence
suggests higher incidence in Africa, where IAP is rare. We
investigated the global incidence of infant invasive GBS disease
and the associated serotypes, updating previous estimates.
Methods: We conducted systematic literature reviews
(PubMed/Medline, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health
Sciences Literature [LILACS], World Health Organization Library
Information System [WHOLIS], and Scopus) and sought unpublished
data regarding invasive GBS disease in infants aged 0-89 days.
We conducted random-effects meta-analyses of incidence, case
fatality risk (CFR), and serotype prevalence. Results: We
identified 135 studies with data on incidence (n = 90), CFR (n =
64), or serotype (n = 45). The pooled incidence of invasive GBS
disease in infants was 0.49 per 1000 live births (95% confidence
interval [CI], .43-.56), and was highest in Africa (1.12) and
lowest in Asia (0.30). Early-onset disease incidence was 0.41
(95% CI, .36-.47); late-onset disease incidence was 0.26 (95%
CI, .21-.30). CFR was 8.4% (95% CI, 6.6%-10.2%). Serotype III
(61.5%) dominated, with 97% of cases caused by serotypes Ia, Ib,
II, III, and V. Conclusions: The incidence of infant GBS disease
remains high in some regions, particularly Africa. We likely
underestimated incidence in some contexts, due to limitations in
case ascertainment and specimen collection and processing.
Burden in Asia requires further investigation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1058-4838 |
DOI: | 10.1093/cid/cix656 |