Development and external validation of a faecal immunochemical test-based prediction model for colorectal cancer detection in symptomatic patients

Background: risk prediction models for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection in symptomatic patients based on available biomarkers may improve CRC diagnosis. Our aim was to develop, compare with the NICE referral criteria and externally validate a CRC prediction model, COLONPREDICT, based on clinical an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Cubiella, Joaquín, Vega, Pablo, Salve, María, Díaz-Ondina, Marta, Alves, Maria Teresa, Quintero, Enrique, Álvarez-Sánchez, Victoria, Fernández Bañares, Fernando, Boadas, Jaume, Campo Fernández de los Rios, Rafael, Bujanda, Luis, Clofent, Juan, Ferrandez, Ángel, Torrealba, Leyanira, Piñol Sánchez, Virgínia, Rodríguez-Alcalde, Daniel, Hernández, Vicent, Fernández-Seara, Javier, Ribes Puig, Josepa, COLONPREDICT study investigators
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: risk prediction models for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection in symptomatic patients based on available biomarkers may improve CRC diagnosis. Our aim was to develop, compare with the NICE referral criteria and externally validate a CRC prediction model, COLONPREDICT, based on clinical and laboratory variables. Methods: this prospective cross-sectional study included consecutive patients with gastrointestinal symptoms referred for colonoscopy between March 2012 and September 2013 in a derivation cohort and between March 2014 and March 2015 in a validation cohort. In the derivation cohort, we assessed symptoms and the NICE referral criteria, and determined levels of faecal haemoglobin and calprotectin, blood haemoglobin, and serum carcinoembryonic antigen before performing an anorectal examination and a colonoscopy. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop the model with diagnostic accuracy with CRC detection as the main outcome. Results: we included 1572 patients in the derivation cohort and 1481 in the validation cohorts, with a 13.6 % and 9.1 % CRC prevalence respectively. The final prediction model included 11 variables: age (years) (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.06), male gender (OR 2.2, 95 % CI 1.5-3.4), faecal haemoglobin ≥20 μg/g (OR 17.0, 95 % CI 10.0-28.6), blood haemoglobin
ISSN:1741-7015
1741-7015
DOI:10.1186/s12916-016-0668-5