Does Access to Microfinance Improve Farm Production? Evidence from Rice Farmers in San Francisco, Agusan del Sur, Philippines

Poverty level remains high (36.7%) in agricultural areas in the Philippines. The second poorest province in the Philippines is Agusan del Sur with incidence reaching as high as 51.2%. One of the approaches to alleviate poverty is to provide access to capital through microfinance. This study draws co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian journal of agriculture and rural development 2013-07, Vol.3 (7), p.469-476
Hauptverfasser: Sarmiento, Jon Marx P, Ellson, Adela G, Traje, Adonis M, E, Gianne Francis Alfred, Comidoy, Sherleen M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Poverty level remains high (36.7%) in agricultural areas in the Philippines. The second poorest province in the Philippines is Agusan del Sur with incidence reaching as high as 51.2%. One of the approaches to alleviate poverty is to provide access to capital through microfinance. This study draws conclusion on the link between access to microfinance and farm production taking the municipality of San Francisco in Agusan del Sur as a case. A total of 95 rice farmers were interviewed. Data revealed that microfinance client farmers were producing 27% more than non-client farmers. The production data were fitted using five production functions namely; (1) Neoclassical, (2) Neoclassical with interaction, (3) Cobb-Douglas, (4) Transcendental and (5) Transcendental with interaction. Using ordinary least squares method, Neoclassical function best fit the data with access to microfinance significantly improving farm production by 23%. Output was most responsive to land (0.60 elasticity (E)), followed by fertilizer (0.18 E), labor (0.14 E), herbicide (0.12 E), seed (0.02 E) and pesticide use (0.00 E). Irrigated farms were 23% more productive than non-irrigated farms. Despite the positive impact of access to microfinance, only 34% of the farmers had availed agricultural microfinance loan from formal institutions while only 18% took advantage during the 2nd season of 2010 rice production.
ISSN:2304-1455
2224-4433
2224-4433
DOI:10.22004/ag.econ.198157