Phylogenetic Analysis of the Lythraceae Based on Four Gene Regions and Morphology

The family limits of the Lythraceae and relationships among the ca. 31 genera remain poorly known in spite of previous phylogenetic studies. We use morphology and DNA sequences from therbcL gene, thetrnL‐F region, andpsaA‐ycf3 intergenic spacer of the chloroplast and the internal transcribed spacer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of plant sciences 2005-11, Vol.166 (6), p.995-1017
Hauptverfasser: Graham, Shirley A., Hall, Jocelyn, Sytsma, Kenneth, Shi, Su‐hua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The family limits of the Lythraceae and relationships among the ca. 31 genera remain poorly known in spite of previous phylogenetic studies. We use morphology and DNA sequences from therbcL gene, thetrnL‐F region, andpsaA‐ycf3 intergenic spacer of the chloroplast and the internal transcribed spacer region of the nucleus to explore relationships for up to 27 genera of the Lythraceaesensu strictoand the monogeneric families Duabangaceae, Punicaceae, Sonneratiaceae, and Trapaceae. Maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian likelihood approaches are employed. Morphology alone provided little phylogenetic resolution. Results from individual gene regions were relatively well resolved and largely congruent, whereas basal relationships were poorly supported. A combined gene analysis of 20 genera produced one fully resolved maximum parsimony tree that corresponded closely to the maximum likelihood and Bayesian trees in which a monophyletic Lythraceae includesDuabanga,Punica,Sonneratia, andTrapaas derived genera within the family.Decodonis sister to the rest of the family in the maximum parsimony and Bayesian trees, followed byLythrumandPeplisat the node above and then by the rest of the family, which diverges into two superclades. In the maximum likelihood tree, the family diverges at the base into two superclades. Six crown clades are well supported but lack unique morphological synapomorphies. Neither superclades nor crown clades correspond to the present tribal and subtribal classification. The New World genera are embedded in four Old World clades. If the basal and near‐basal positions for the Northern Hemisphere generaDecodon,Lythrum, andPeplisare confirmed, the origin of the family is more likely Laurasian than Gondwanan. The biogeography and early fossil record of the family indicate that the family originated by the late Cretaceous and had extensively diversified and radiated into Southeast Asia and North America by the lower Eocene.
ISSN:1058-5893
1537-5315
DOI:10.1086/432631