Multivariable prediction model for both 90-day mortality and long-term survival for individual patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: does the predicted survival justify the surgical risk?

Abstract Background The risk of death after surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is high; nearly one in every five patients dies within 90 days after surgery. When the oncological benefit is limited, a high-risk resection may not be justified. This retrospective cohort study aimed to create two...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 2023-04, Vol.110 (5), p.599-605
Hauptverfasser: van Keulen, Anne-Marleen, Buettner, Stefan, Erdmann, Joris I, Pratschke, Johann, Ratti, Francesca, Jarnagin, William R, Schnitzbauer, Andreas A, Lang, Hauke, Ruzzenente, Andrea, Nadalin, Silvio, Cescon, Matteo, Topal, Baki, Olthof, Pim B, Groot Koerkamp, Bas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background The risk of death after surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is high; nearly one in every five patients dies within 90 days after surgery. When the oncological benefit is limited, a high-risk resection may not be justified. This retrospective cohort study aimed to create two preoperative prognostic models to predict 90-day mortality and overall survival (OS) after major liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Methods Separate models were built with factors known before surgery using multivariable regression analysis for 90-day mortality and OS. Patients were categorized in three groups: favourable profile for surgical resection (90-day mortality rate below 10 per cent and predicted OS more than 3 years), unfavourable profile (90-day mortality rate above 25 per cent and/or predicted OS below 1.5 years), and an intermediate group. Results A total of 1673 patients were included. Independent risk factors for both 90-day mortality and OS included ASA grade III–IV, large tumour diameter, and right-sided hepatectomy. Additional risk factors for 90-day mortality were advanced age and preoperative cholangitis; those for long-term OS were high BMI, preoperative jaundice, Bismuth IV, and hepatic artery involvement. In total, 294 patients (17.6 per cent) had a favourable risk profile for surgery (90-day mortality rate 5.8 per cent and median OS 42 months), 271 patients (16.2 per cent) an unfavourable risk profile (90-day mortality rate 26.8 per cent and median OS 16 months), and 1108 patients (66.2 per cent) an intermediate risk profile (90-day mortality rate 12.5 per cent and median OS 27 months). Conclusion Preoperative risk models for 90-day mortality and OS can help identify patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who are unlikely to benefit from surgical resection. Tailored shared decision-making is particularly essential for the large intermediate group. When the oncological benefit is limited, a high-risk resection may be not be justified. Two preoperative prognostic models were created to predict 90-day mortality and survival after major liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. These can help identify patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who are unlikely to benefit from surgical resection.
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1093/bjs/znad057