Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare in Kano, Nigeria : barriers and challenges for healthcare professionals
Background: Though there has been increased advocacy for screening for Intimate partner violence (IPV) in healthcare over the past decades, data from developed country context suggest that only one in ten healthcare providers routinely screen for this phenomena suggesting barriers. Knowledge on the...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Dissertation |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Though there has been increased advocacy for screening for Intimate
partner violence (IPV) in healthcare over the past decades, data from
developed country context suggest that only one in ten healthcare
providers routinely screen for this phenomena suggesting barriers.
Knowledge on the screening activity, with regard to IPV, and related
barriers among healthcare providers in Sub-Saharan Africa is lacking.
Aims: The aim of this dissertation is to scrutinize provider-related as well as
client related barriers to screening for Intimate Partner Violence in
healthcare in the Sub-Saharan African context, using data from healthcare
facility in Kano, Northern Nigeria.
Methods: The cross-sectional studies were based on three questionnaires assessing
readiness to screen and screening activity, satisfaction with care and
preferences for screening among patients. Domestic Violence Health Care
Provider Survey Scale was utilised to measure healthcare providers
readiness to screen for IPV as well as actual screening activity (Study
I-III).Structured interviews were conducted with women attending the
General Out-patient department, maternal and child health clinics of the
participating hospital to probe their preference for screening and their
satisfaction with care using the pyramid patient questionnaire (Study
IV). Data were analysed using relevant univariate and multivariate
statistical methods.
Results: The instruments utilised illustrated a stable structural validity (study
I) and internal consistency (Studies I, II, III & IV). Barriers to
screening were eminent both from the provider and the client perspective.
Majority of Health Care Provider (HCP) did not inquire about the
possibility/occurrence of IPV from their clients (74%) and scored on
average moderately on readiness to screen indicator (i.e. self-efficacy,
system support, attitudes towards screening, professional roles and
victim/provider safety subscales) suggesting barriers (Study III).
Readiness to screen for IPV as well as screening for IPV was associated
with several demographic and occupational characteristics of the
healthcare provider (Study II). Social workers perceived a higher
self-efficacy and a better support network to refer victims of violence
than other professions. Gender and profession were significantly
associated with blaming the victim with males and doctors less likely to
blame the victim. Age, ethnicity and profession impacted significantly on
professional roles related to |
---|