Influence of CYP1A1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and NQO1 Genotypes and Cumulative Smoking Dose on Lung Cancer Risk in a Swedish Population

The major identified risk factor for lung cancer is tobacco smoking. We identified previously the possible modifying influence of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk in a Swedish population. The present study, extended by several study subjects and with analyses for polymorphisms in G...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2004-06, Vol.13 (6), p.908-914
Hauptverfasser: ALEXANDRIE, Anna-Karin, NYBERG, Fredrik, WARHOLM, Margareta, RANNUG, Agneta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The major identified risk factor for lung cancer is tobacco smoking. We identified previously the possible modifying influence of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms on lung cancer risk in a Swedish population. The present study, extended by several study subjects and with analyses for polymorphisms in GSTT1 and NQO1 , includes 524 lung cancer cases and 530 control subjects. No evidence for an influence of genetic polymorphisms in CYP1A1 , GSTM1 , GSTT1 , and NQO1 on lung cancer risk overall was found. In smokers, there was, however, a suggestion that the variant CYP1A1 and NQO1 genotypes may confer an increased risk for squamous cell carcinoma. In ever smokers, the homozygously deleted GSTM1 ( GSTM1*O/*O ) genotype was significantly associated with increased risk of small cell carcinoma (adjusted odds ratio 2.72, 95% confidence interval 1.32-5.90). The risks noted for the variant CYP1A1 genotypes and the GSTM1*O/*O genotype seemed to be restricted to light smokers. The GSTT1*O/*O genotype also appeared to be a possible risk factor in light smokers, whereas, in heavy smokers, this genotype was associated with decreased risk for lung cancer overall (odds ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.99). Due to the multiple comparisons made, we cannot exclude the possibility that some of these associations may represent chance findings.
ISSN:1055-9965
1538-7755
DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.908.13.6