Impact of Candesartan on Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Heart Failure
CONTEXT Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), but it is not known whether angiotensin receptor blockers have the same effect. OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on MI and other coronary events in pati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2005-10, Vol.294 (14), p.1794-1798 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce the risk of myocardial
infarction (MI), but it is not known whether angiotensin receptor blockers
have the same effect. OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan
on MI and other coronary events in patients with heart failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality
and Morbidity (CHARM) program, a randomized, placebo-controlled study enrolling
patients (mean age, 66 [SD, 11] years) with New York Heart Association class
II to IV symptoms who were randomly allocated to receive candesartan (target
dose, 32 mg once daily) or matching placebo given in addition to optimal therapy
for heart failure. Patients were enrolled from March 1999 through March 2001.
Of 7599 patients allocated, 4004 (53%) had experienced a previous MI, and
1808 (24%) currently had angina. At baseline, 3125 (41%) were receiving an
ACE inhibitor; 4203 (55%), a β-blocker; 3153 (42%), a lipid-lowering
drug; 4246 (56%), aspirin; and 6286 (83%), a diuretic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The primary outcome of the present analysis was the composite of cardiovascular
death or nonfatal MI in patients with heart failure receiving candesartan
or placebo. RESULTS During the median follow-up of 37.7 months, the primary outcome of cardiovascular
death or nonfatal MI was significantly reduced in the candesartan group (775
patients [20.4%]) vs the placebo group (868 [22.9%]) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87;
95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.96; P = .004;
number needed to treat [NNT], 40). Nonfatal MI alone was also significantly
reduced in the candesartan group (116 [3.1%]) vs the placebo group (148 [3.9%])
(HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98; P = .03;
NNT, 118). The secondary outcome of fatal MI, sudden death, or nonfatal MI
was significantly reduced with candesartan (459 [12.1%]) vs placebo (522 [13.8%])
(HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.97; P = .02;
NNT, 59). Risk reductions in cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI were similar
across predetermined subgroups and the component CHARM trials. There was no
impact on hospitalizations for unstable angina or coronary revascularization
procedures with candesartan. CONCLUSION In patients with heart failure, candesartan significantly reduces the
risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.294.14.1794 |