Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter?
Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether the improved prediction of risk for perinatal mortality obtained with the use of a customised birthweight standard can also be obtained with the use of a non‐customised but intrauterine‐based standard. Design Population‐based cohort st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2008-10, Vol.115 (11), p.1397-1404 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether the improved prediction of risk for perinatal mortality obtained with the use of a customised birthweight standard can also be obtained with the use of a non‐customised but intrauterine‐based standard.
Design Population‐based cohort study.
Setting Sweden.
Population Births in the Swedish Medical Birth Register between 1992 and 2001 (n = 782 303) with complete data on birthweight, gestational age, sex, maternal age, pre‐pregnancy body mass index, height, parity, and ethnicity.
Methods We calculated the relative risks (RRs) of stillbirth and early neonatal mortality among small‐for‐gestational‐age (SGA) births as established by (1) a customised standard, (2) a population standard based on birthweights, and (3) a population standard based on a best estimate of intrauterine weights.
Main outcome measures Stillbirth and early neonatal mortality ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1470-0328 1471-0528 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01870.x |