A randomized clinical trial of two emergency contraceptive pill regimens in a Ugandan population
Abstract Background. Recent trials on emergency contraception (EC) have indicated that levonorgestrel (LNG) used alone has fewer side-effects and is more efficacious than the Yuzpe regimen (high dose combined oral contraceptive pills). However, the experienced side-effects and acceptability may vary...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2010-05, Vol.89 (5), p.670-676 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background. Recent trials on emergency contraception (EC) have indicated that levonorgestrel (LNG) used alone has fewer side-effects and is more efficacious than the Yuzpe regimen (high dose combined oral contraceptive pills). However, the experienced side-effects and acceptability may vary between different groups or societies. Objective. The primary objective of this study was to determine side-effects and acceptability of two emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) regimens among users in Kampala, Uganda. Study design. Randomized clinical trial. Methods. A total of 337 women were enrolled in a double blind randomized clinical trial. Women requesting ECPs within 72 hours after unprotected sexual intercourse received either LNG or the Yuzpe regimen. The women returned for follow-up after three days and a follow-up interview was performed after one year. Results. Levonorgestrel had significantly fewer side-effects than the Yuzpe regimen (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-6349 1600-0412 |
DOI: | 10.3109/00016341003611220 |