Minimal residual disease assessment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a Swedish multi‐centre study comparing real‐time polymerase chain reaction and multicolour flow cytometry

Summary Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is a powerful prognostic factor for determining the risk of relapse in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). In this Swedish multi‐centre study of childhood ALL diagnosed between 2002 and 2006, the MRD levels were analysed in 726 follow‐up s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of haematology 2011-03, Vol.152 (6), p.743-753
Hauptverfasser: Thörn, Ingrid, Forestier, Erik, Botling, Johan, Thuresson, Britt, Wasslavik, Carina, Björklund, Elisabet, Li, Aihong, Lindström‐Eriksson, Eleonor, Malec, Maria, Grönlund, Elisabeth, Torikka, Kerstin, Heldrup, Jesper, Abrahamsson, Jonas, Behrendtz, Mikael, Söderhäll, Stefan, Jacobsson, Stefan, Olofsson, Tor, Porwit, Anna, Lönnerholm, Gudmar, Rosenquist, Richard, Sundström, Christer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is a powerful prognostic factor for determining the risk of relapse in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). In this Swedish multi‐centre study of childhood ALL diagnosed between 2002 and 2006, the MRD levels were analysed in 726 follow‐up samples in 228 children using real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ‐PCR) of rearranged immunoglobulin/T‐cell receptor genes and multicolour flow cytometry (FCM). Using an MRD threshold of 0·1%, which was the sensitivity level reached in all analyses, the concordance between RQ‐PCR and FCM MRD values at day 29 was 84%. In B‐cell precursor ALL, an MRD level of ≥0·1% at day 29 predicted a higher risk of bone marrow relapse (BMR) with both methods, although FCM was a better discriminator. However, considering the higher median MRD values achieved with RQ‐PCR, a higher MRD cut‐off (≥0·2%) improved the predictive capacity of RQ‐PCR. In T‐ALL, RQ‐PCR was notably superior to FCM in predicting risk of BMR. That notwithstanding, MRD levels of ≥0·1%, detected by either method at day 29, could not predict isolated extramedullary relapse. In conclusion, the concordance between RQ‐PCR and FCM was high and hence both methods are valuable clinical tools for identifying childhood ALL cases with increased risk of BMR.
ISSN:0007-1048
1365-2141
1365-2141
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08456.x