Responsiveness of the One-Leg Hop Test and the Square Hop Test to Fatiguing Intermittent Aerobic Work and Subsequent Recovery

ABSTRACTRos, AGM, Holm, SE, Fridén, C, and Heijne, A.I.-L.M. Responsiveness of the one-leg hop test and the square hop test to fatiguing intermittent aerobic work and subsequent recovery. J Strength Cond Res 27(4)988–994, 2013—The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the responsiveness of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2013-04, Vol.27 (4), p.988-994
Hauptverfasser: Ros, Anette G.M., Holm, Susanne E., Fridén, Cecilia, Heijne, Annette I.-L.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACTRos, AGM, Holm, SE, Fridén, C, and Heijne, A.I.-L.M. Responsiveness of the one-leg hop test and the square hop test to fatiguing intermittent aerobic work and subsequent recovery. J Strength Cond Res 27(4)988–994, 2013—The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the responsiveness of the 1-leg hop test and the square hop (SH) test to fatiguing intermittent aerobic work and during recovery. A further aim was to study sex differences in trends. Members of 4 sub-elite-level soccer teams were invited to participate. Ten men (mean ± SD) aged 20.7 ± 3.4 years and 10 women aged 21.8 ± 4.8 years accepted to participate in the test. The Yo-Yo intermittent Endurance test Level 2, was used as a standardized sport-specific fatiguing protocol. The 1-leg hop test and the SH test were performed before, immediately after, 15, and 30 minutes after the fatiguing exercise. To quantify the level and progression of fatigue and recovery, blood lactate and heart rate were measured, and general fatigue was estimated on Borgʼs rating of perceived exertion scale. No significant difference in performance in either of the hop tests was found immediately after intermittent aerobic fatiguing work. Performance in the 1-leg hop test significantly decreased (p = 0.002), whereas that in the SH test increased (p = 0.001) between baseline and 15–30 minutes after fatiguing work. No significant difference in trends between sexes was found. The performance in the 1-leg hop test significantly decreased during 30 minutes of recovery compared with that in the nonfatigued conditions and might therefore be used on the field as a complement to other physical parameters to detect remaining fatigue. Note that the 1-leg hop test did not immediately respond to intermittent aerobic work. It is not recommended to use the SH test for measuring fatigue and subsequent recovery because the performance constantly increased despite the present objective and subjective fatigue.
ISSN:1064-8011
1533-4287
DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825feb5b