An international prospective cohort study of mobile phone users and health (COSMOS): Factors affecting validity of self-reported mobile phone use

•Agreement for self-reported phone use was higher for call duration than frequency.•Subjects tended to underestimate rather than overestimate mobile phone use.•Agreement for self-reported call frequency was higher in men and older subjects.•Subjects who reported symptoms were more likely to overesti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of hygiene and environmental health 2018-01, Vol.221 (1), p.1-8
Hauptverfasser: Toledano, Mireille B., Auvinen, Anssi, Tettamanti, Giorgio, Cao, Yang, Feychting, Maria, Ahlbom, Anders, Fremling, Karin, Heinävaara, Sirpa, Kojo, Katja, Knowles, Gemma, Smith, Rachel B., Schüz, Joachim, Johansen, Christoffer, Poulsen, Aslak Harbo, Deltour, Isabelle, Vermeulen, Roel, Kromhout, Hans, Elliott, Paul, Hillert, Lena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Agreement for self-reported phone use was higher for call duration than frequency.•Subjects tended to underestimate rather than overestimate mobile phone use.•Agreement for self-reported call frequency was higher in men and older subjects.•Subjects who reported symptoms were more likely to overestimate low call duration. This study investigates validity of self-reported mobile phone use in a subset of 75 993 adults from the COSMOS cohort study. Agreement between self-reported and operator-derived mobile call frequency and duration for a 3-month period was assessed using Cohen’s weighted Kappa (κ). Sensitivity and specificity of both self-reported high (≥10 calls/day or ≥4h/week) and low (≤6 calls/week or
ISSN:1438-4639
1618-131X
1618-131X
DOI:10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.09.008