Cost-effectiveness of sex-neutral HPV-vaccination in Sweden, accounting for herd-immunity and sexual behaviour

•Cost-effectiveness of sex-neutral HPV-vaccination in a high-coverage setting.•Dynamic model accounting for sexual behaviour, including age preferences and MSM.•Sex-neutral vaccination would reduce HPV-related disease.•Sex-neutral HPV-vaccination would be good value for money in Sweden.•Also HPV-vac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2018-08, Vol.36 (34), p.5160-5165
Hauptverfasser: Wolff, Ellen, Elfström, K. Miriam, Haugen Cange, Hedda, Larsson, Sofie, Englund, Helene, Sparén, Pär, Roth, Adam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Age
HPV
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Cost-effectiveness of sex-neutral HPV-vaccination in a high-coverage setting.•Dynamic model accounting for sexual behaviour, including age preferences and MSM.•Sex-neutral vaccination would reduce HPV-related disease.•Sex-neutral HPV-vaccination would be good value for money in Sweden.•Also HPV-vaccinating boys would be cost-effective despite 80% coverage among girls. The aim was to assess cost-effectiveness of expanding the Swedish HPV-vaccination program to include preadolescent boys, by comparing health-effects and costs of HPV-related disease, with a sex-neutral vaccination program versus only vaccinating girls. We used a dynamic compartmental model to simulate the burden of HPV16/18-related disease in Sweden, accounting for indirect effects of vaccination through herd-immunity. The model accounted for sexual behaviour, such as age preferences and men who have sex with men. The main outcome was number of individuals with HPV-related cancers (cervical, genital, anal and oropharyngeal cancer) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Costs included in the analysis were those incurred when treating HPV-related cancer and CIN, production losses during sick-leave, and acquisition and administration of vaccine. Health effects were measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALY). The time horizon was set to 100 years, and both effects and costs were discounted by 3% annually. Health effects and costs were accumulated over the time horizon and used to create an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. A sex-neutral vaccination program would reduce HPV-related cancer and CIN, both due to direct effects among vaccinated as well as through herd-immunity, further decreasing HPV-related cancer burden annually by around 60 cases among men and women respectively in steady-state. The cost per gained QALY was estimated to 40,000 euro. Applying the procurement price of 2017, sex-neutral vaccination was dominant. Introducing a sex-neutral HPV-vaccination program would be good value for money also in Sweden where there this 80% coverage in the current HPV-vaccination program for preadolescent girls. The cost-effectiveness of a sex-neutral program is highly dependent on the price of the vaccine, the lower the price the more favourable it is to also vaccinate boys.
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.07.018