Clinical relevance of bacterial resistance in lower respiratory tract infection in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicentre European trial

The impact of antimicrobial resistance on clinical outcomes in patients with lower respiratory tract infection in primary care is largely unknown. To determine the illness course of infections with resistant bacteria in adults presenting to primary care with acute cough. Secondary analysis of a mult...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of general practice 2018-09, Vol.68 (674), p.e627-e632
Hauptverfasser: Teepe, Jolien, Broekhuizen, Berna Dl, Goossens, Herman, Hordijk, Patricia Marinka, Loens, Katherine, Lammens, Christine, Ieven, Margareta, Little, Paul, Butler, Chris C, Coenen, Samuel, Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek, Henriques-Normark, Birgitta, Verheij, Theo Jm
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The impact of antimicrobial resistance on clinical outcomes in patients with lower respiratory tract infection in primary care is largely unknown. To determine the illness course of infections with resistant bacteria in adults presenting to primary care with acute cough. Secondary analysis of a multicentre European trial in primary care. A total of 2061 adults with acute cough (lasting ≤28 days) were recruited from primary care and randomised to amoxicillin or placebo. To reflect the natural course of disease, only patients in the placebo group ( = 1021) were eligible. Nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and/or sputa (when available) were analysed at baseline and and isolates underwent susceptibility testing. Patients recorded their symptoms in a diary every day for 4 weeks. Patients with and without resistant bacterial infection were compared with regards to symptom severity, duration of symptoms, worsening of illness, and duration of interference with normal activities or work. Of the 834 patients with diary records, 104 showed and/or infection. Of this number, 54 (52%) were resistant to antibiotics, while seven (7%) were resistant to penicillin. For the duration of symptoms rated 'moderately bad or worse' (hazard ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67 to 2.44), mean symptom severity (difference -0.48, 95% CI = -1.17 to 0.21), and worsening of illness (odds ratio 0.31, 95% CI = 0.07 to 1.41), there was no statistically significant difference between the antibiotic-resistant and antibiotic-sensitive groups. The illness course of antibiotic-resistant lower respiratory tract infection does not differ from that caused by antibiotic-sensitive bacteria.
ISSN:0960-1643
1478-5242
1478-5242
DOI:10.3399/bjgp18X698333