Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

Leading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing that can protect scholarship. It took 12 hours of discussion, 18 questions and 3 rounds to reach. Leading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature (London) 2019-12, Vol.576 (7786), p.210-212
Hauptverfasser: Grudniewicz, Agnes, Moher, David, Cobey, Kelly D., Bryson, Gregory L., Cukier, Samantha, Allen, Kristiann, Ardern, Clare, Balcom, Lesley, Barros, Tiago, Berger, Monica, Ciro, Jairo Buitrago, Cugusi, Lucia, Donaldson, Michael R., Egger, Matthias, Graham, Ian D., Hodgkinson, Matt, Khan, Karim M., Mabizela, Mahlubi, Manca, Andrea, Milzow, Katrin, Mouton, Johann, Muchenje, Marvelous, Olijhoek, Tom, Ommaya, Alexander, Patwardhan, Bhushan, Poff, Deborah, Proulx, Laurie, Rodger, Marc, Severin, Anna, Strinzel, Michaela, Sylos-Labini, Mauro, Tamblyn, Robyn, van Niekerk, Marthie, Wicherts, Jelte M., Lalu, Manoj M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
706/648/479
706/648/496
Best practice
Comment
Coronary vessels
Editorials
Ethical aspects
Open access publishing
Peer review
Quality
Researchers
Scholarly publishing
Scholars
Scientific papers
Self interest
Social aspects
Websites
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Leading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing that can protect scholarship. It took 12 hours of discussion, 18 questions and 3 rounds to reach. Leading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing that can protect scholarship. It took 12 hours of discussion, 18 questions and 3 rounds to reach.
ISSN:0028-0836
1476-4687
DOI:10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y