Long-term survival of 1338 MM patients treated with tandem autologous vs. autologous-allogeneic transplantation
Contrary to tandem autologous transplant (auto-auto), autologous followed by reduced intensity conditioning allogenic transplantation (auto-allo) offers graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect but with higher toxicity. Trials comparing these two strategies relied on availability of HLA-matched sibling don...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) 2020-09, Vol.55 (9), p.1810-1816 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Contrary to tandem autologous transplant (auto-auto), autologous followed by reduced intensity conditioning allogenic transplantation (auto-allo) offers graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect but with higher toxicity. Trials comparing these two strategies relied on availability of HLA-matched sibling donors for arm allocation (biological randomization) and yielded conflicting results. A pooled analysis of multiple trials with extended follow up provides an opportunity to compare these strategies. We obtained individual patient data from participants of four trials comparing auto-auto vs. auto-allo after induction therapy. There were 899 patients in auto-auto and 439 in auto-allo. Median follow up of survivors was 118.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 78.0 months in auto-auto and 98.3 months in auto-allo (HR = 0.84,
P
= 0.02). OS was 36.4% vs. 44.1% at 10 years (
P
= 0.01) for auto-auto and auto-allo, respectively. Progression-free survival was also improved in auto-allo (HR = 0.84,
P
= 0.004). Risk of non-relapse mortality was higher in auto-allo (10 year 8.3% vs. 19.7%,
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-3369 1476-5365 1476-5365 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41409-020-0887-4 |