Long-term survival of 1338 MM patients treated with tandem autologous vs. autologous-allogeneic transplantation

Contrary to tandem autologous transplant (auto-auto), autologous followed by reduced intensity conditioning allogenic transplantation (auto-allo) offers graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect but with higher toxicity. Trials comparing these two strategies relied on availability of HLA-matched sibling don...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) 2020-09, Vol.55 (9), p.1810-1816
Hauptverfasser: Costa, Luciano J., Iacobelli, Simona, Pasquini, Marcelo C., Modi, Riddhi, Giaccone, Luisa, Blade, Joan, Schonland, Stefan, Evangelista, Andrea, Perez-Simon, Jose A., Hari, Parameswaran, Brown, Elizabeth E., Giralt, Sergio A., Patriarca, Francesca, Stadtmauer, Edward A., Rosinol, Laura, Krishnan, Amrita Y., Gahrton, Gösta, Bruno, Benedetto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Contrary to tandem autologous transplant (auto-auto), autologous followed by reduced intensity conditioning allogenic transplantation (auto-allo) offers graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect but with higher toxicity. Trials comparing these two strategies relied on availability of HLA-matched sibling donors for arm allocation (biological randomization) and yielded conflicting results. A pooled analysis of multiple trials with extended follow up provides an opportunity to compare these strategies. We obtained individual patient data from participants of four trials comparing auto-auto vs. auto-allo after induction therapy. There were 899 patients in auto-auto and 439 in auto-allo. Median follow up of survivors was 118.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 78.0 months in auto-auto and 98.3 months in auto-allo (HR = 0.84, P  = 0.02). OS was 36.4% vs. 44.1% at 10 years ( P  = 0.01) for auto-auto and auto-allo, respectively. Progression-free survival was also improved in auto-allo (HR = 0.84, P  = 0.004). Risk of non-relapse mortality was higher in auto-allo (10 year 8.3% vs. 19.7%, P  
ISSN:0268-3369
1476-5365
1476-5365
DOI:10.1038/s41409-020-0887-4