A randomized phase 3 trial of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia: the ASPEN study

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition is an effective treatment approach for patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). The phase 3 ASPEN study compared the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib, a first-generation BTK inhibitor, with zanubrutinib, a novel highly selective BTK inhibitor, in pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2020-10, Vol.136 (18), p.2038-2050
Hauptverfasser: Tam, Constantine S., Opat, Stephen, D'Sa, Shirley, Jurczak, Wojciech, Lee, Hui-Peng, Cull, Gavin, Owen, Roger G., Marlton, Paula, Wahlin, Björn E., Sanz, Ramón Garcia, McCarthy, Helen, Mulligan, Stephen, Tedeschi, Alessandra, Castillo, Jorge J., Czyz, Jaroslaw, Fernández de Larrea, Carlos, Belada, David, Libby, Edward, Matous, Jeffrey V., Motta, Marina, Siddiqi, Tanya, Tani, Monica, Trneny, Marek, Minnema, Monique C., Buske, Christian, Leblond, Veronique, Trotman, Judith, Chan, Wai Y., Schneider, Jingjing, Ro, Sunhee, Cohen, Aileen, Huang, Jane, Dimopoulos, Meletios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition is an effective treatment approach for patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). The phase 3 ASPEN study compared the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib, a first-generation BTK inhibitor, with zanubrutinib, a novel highly selective BTK inhibitor, in patients with WM. Patients with MYD88L265P disease were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with ibrutinib or zanubrutinib. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a complete response (CR) or a very good partial response (VGPR) by independent review. Key secondary end points included major response rate (MRR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), disease burden, and safety. A total of 201 patients were randomized, and 199 received ≥1 dose of study treatment. No patient achieved a CR. Twenty-nine (28%) zanubrutinib patients and 19 (19%) ibrutinib patients achieved a VGPR, a nonstatistically significant difference (P = .09). MRRs were 77% and 78%, respectively. Median DOR and PFS were not reached; 84% and 85% of ibrutinib and zanubrutinib patients were progression free at 18 months. Atrial fibrillation, contusion, diarrhea, peripheral edema, hemorrhage, muscle spasms, and pneumonia, as well as adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, were less common among zanubrutinib recipients. Incidence of neutropenia was higher with zanubrutinib, although grade ≥3 infection rates were similar in both arms (1.2 and 1.1 events per 100 person-months). These results demonstrate that zanubrutinib and ibrutinib are highly effective in the treatment of WM, but zanubrutinib treatment was associated with a trend toward better response quality and less toxicity, particularly cardiovascular toxicity. •Although not statistically significant, a higher rate of CR/VGPR was observed for zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib (28% vs 19%, respectively).•The incidence and severity of most BTK-associated toxicities (including atrial fibrillation) were lower with zanubrutinib than ibrutinib. [Display omitted]
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood.2020006844