Anatomical and dynamic rotational alignment in spastic unilateral cerebral palsy

•Internal hip rotation is common even in mild unilateral CP.•Internal hip rotation is compensated by pelvic external rotation in unilateral CP.•Symmetrical foot progression overrules the neurological involvement. Even in mild unilateral cerebral palsy increased internal hip rotation can be noted on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gait & posture 2020-09, Vol.81, p.153-158
Hauptverfasser: Riad, Jacques, Finnbogason, Thröstur, Broström, Eva
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Internal hip rotation is common even in mild unilateral CP.•Internal hip rotation is compensated by pelvic external rotation in unilateral CP.•Symmetrical foot progression overrules the neurological involvement. Even in mild unilateral cerebral palsy increased internal hip rotation can be noted on physical- and gait examination. The influence of spasticity on femoral growth in the transverse plane is not clear. These deviations and asymmetry in movement pattern may negatively affect efficiency of gait and cause psychological concerns about appearance. Is increased internal hip rotation on the involved side in mild unilateral CP common and is there compensatory external pelvic rotation to keep foot progression symmetrical? This prospective study included 45 individuals with unilateral cerebral palsy, mean age 17.7 (13.0−24.0) years. All were Gross Motor Function Classification Level I. Physical examination, three-dimensional gait analysis and magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of rotational alignment was performed. On physical examination internal hip rotation was mean 50.6 (SD 10.4) degrees on the involved side and 44.3 (SD 10.3) on the non-involved side, p = 0.001. In gait analysis calculating the whole gait cycle, internal hip rotation was mean 2.3 (6.2) degrees on the involved side, and on the non-involved side external 1.8 (7.6) degrees, p = 0.004. Increased external pelvic rotation was noted on the involved side, mean 2.0 (4.3) degrees with corresponding internal rotation on the non-involved side, mean 3.6 (4.4), p = 0.001. There was no difference in foot progression, p = 0.067, with mean 5.1 (8.6) and 3.9 (6.4) external respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed femoral torsion on the involved side mean 17.3 (11.3) degrees compared to 11.4 (10.8) on the non-involved side, p = 0.001. Transverse plane asymmetry in the femur was noted in mild unilateral cerebral palsy. Increased anatomical and dynamic internal rotation was compensated for by external pelvic rotation. Rotational malalignment may contribute to gait deviations in this mild group and should be part of the overall assessment.
ISSN:0966-6362
1879-2219
1879-2219
DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.07.010