Serum Amyloidogenic Nanoplaques and Cytokines in Alzheimer’s Disease: Pilot Study in a Small Naturalistic Memory Clinic Cohort

Background: Neuroinflammation is a central component of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and correlates closely with amyloid pathology. Markers of inflammation such as cytokines, and amyloidogenic aggregates, so-called nanoplaques, are both promising biomarker candidates for AD. We have previously shown tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Alzheimer's disease 2022-01, Vol.86 (3), p.1459-1470
Hauptverfasser: Aksnes, Mari, Aass, Hans Christian D., Tiiman, Ann, Terenius, Lars, Bogdanović, Nenad, Vukojević, Vladana, Knapskog, Anne-Brita
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Neuroinflammation is a central component of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and correlates closely with amyloid pathology. Markers of inflammation such as cytokines, and amyloidogenic aggregates, so-called nanoplaques, are both promising biomarker candidates for AD. We have previously shown that there is a relationship between the levels of nanoplaques and cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid, but it is unknown whether this association extends to serum. Objective: Investigate in a naturalistic memory clinic cohort whether the associations between nanoplaques and cytokines in the cerebrospinal fluid extends to serum. Methods: We collected serum from 49 patients assessed for cognitive complaints at the Oslo University Hospital Memory Clinic (15 with clinical AD). We assessed the levels of serum nanoplaques with the novel Thioflavin-T fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (ThT-FCS) assay. Serum levels of nine cytokines (eotaxin-1, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], interleukin [IL]-6, IL-7, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), gamma induced protein 10 (IP-10), macrophage inflammatory protein [MIP]-1α, and MIP-1β) were quantified with a multiplex assay and read on a Luminex IS 200 instrument. Results: Serum nanoplaques were not increased in clinical AD patients compared to non-AD memory clinic patients and nanoplaques were not associated with any cytokines. The cytokines IL-8 and G-CSF were increased in patients with clinical AD compared to non-AD patients. Conclusion: In this small pilot study, serum nanoplaques were not associated with serum cytokines. Nanoplaque levels could not be used to separate clinical AD patients from non-AD patients in this unselected memory clinic cohort.
ISSN:1387-2877
1875-8908
1875-8908
DOI:10.3233/JAD-215504