The MUSES∗: a prognostic study on 1360 patients with sinonasal cancer undergoing endoscopic surgery-based treatment: ∗MUlti-institutional collaborative Study on Endoscopically treated Sinonasal cancers

Background: Over the last 2 decades, transnasal endoscopic surgery (TES) has become the most frequently employed surgical technique to treat sinonasal malignancies. The rarity and heterogeneity of sinonasal cancers have hampered large non-population-based analyses. Methodology: All patients receivin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 2022-08, Vol.171, p.161-182
Hauptverfasser: Ferrari, Marco, Mattavelli, Davide, Tomasoni, Michele, Raffetti, Elena, Bossi, Paolo, Schreiber, Alberto, Orlandi, Ester, Taboni, Stefano, Rampinelli, Vittorio, Gualtieri, Tommaso, Turri-Zanoni, Mario, Battaglia, Paolo, Arosio, Alberto D, Bignami, Maurizio, Tartaro, Tiziana, Molteni, Marinella, Bertazzoni, Giacomo, Fiaux-Camous, Domitille, Jourdaine, Clement, Verillaud, Benjamin, Eu, Donovan, Nair, Deepa, Moiyadi, Aliasgar, Shetty, Prakash, Ghosh-Laskar, Sarbani, Budrukkar, Ashwini, Magrini, Stefano M, Guillerm, Sophie, Faivre, Sandrine, Piazza, Cesare, Gilbert, Ralph W, Irish, Jonathan C, de Almeida, John R, Pai, Prathamesh, Herman, Philippe, Castelnuovo, Paolo, Nicolai, Piero
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Over the last 2 decades, transnasal endoscopic surgery (TES) has become the most frequently employed surgical technique to treat sinonasal malignancies. The rarity and heterogeneity of sinonasal cancers have hampered large non-population-based analyses. Methodology: All patients receiving TES-including treatment between 1995 and 2021 in 5 referral hospitals were included. A prognostic study was performed, and multivariable models were transformed into nomograms. Training and validation sets were based on results from 3 European and 2 non-European centres, respectively. Results: The training and validation set included 940 and 420 patients, respectively. The mean age at surgery, primary-versus-recurrent presentation, histology distribution, type of surgery, T category and type of adjuvant treatment were differently distributed in the training and validation set. In the training set, 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival with a 95%-confidence interval were 72.7% (69.5–76.0%) and 66.4% (63.1–69.8%), respectively, significantly varying with histology. At multivariable analyses, age, gender, previous treatment, the extent of resection on the cranial, lateral and posterolateral axes, grade/subtype, T category, nodal status, margin status and adjuvant treatment were all associated with different prognostic outcomes, displaying a heterogeneous significance and effect size according to histology. The internal and external validation of nomograms was satisfactory (optimism-corrected C-index >0.7 and cumulative area under curve >0.7) for all histologies but mucosal melanoma. Conclusions: Outcomes of TES-based treatment of sinonasal cancers vary substantially with histology. This large, non-population-based study provides benchmark data on the prognosis of sinonasal cancers that are deemed suitable for treatment including TES.
ISSN:0959-8049
1879-0852
DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2022.05.010