Lung perfusion disturbances in nonhospitalized post‐COVID with dyspnea—A magnetic resonance imaging feasibility study

Background Dyspnea is common after COVID‐19. Though the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown, lung perfusion abnormalities could contribute to lingering dyspnea. Objectives To detect pulmonary perfusion disturbances in nonhospitalized individuals with the post‐COVID condition and persistent dys...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of internal medicine 2022-12, Vol.292 (6), p.941-956
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Jimmy Z., Granberg, Tobias, Shams, Roya, Petersson, Sven, Sköld, Magnus, Nyrén, Sven, Lundberg, Johan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Dyspnea is common after COVID‐19. Though the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown, lung perfusion abnormalities could contribute to lingering dyspnea. Objectives To detect pulmonary perfusion disturbances in nonhospitalized individuals with the post‐COVID condition and persistent dyspnea 4–13 months after the disease onset. Methods Individuals with dyspnea and matched healthy controls were recruited for dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI), a 6‐min walk test, and an assessment of dyspnea. The DCE‐MRI was quantified using two parametric values: mean time to peak (TTP) and TTP ratio, reflecting the total lung perfusion resistance and the fraction of lung with delayed perfusion, respectively. Results Twenty‐eight persons with persistent dyspnea (mean age 46.5 ± 8.0 years, 75% women) and 22 controls (mean age 44.1 ± 10.8 years, 73% women) were included. There was no systematic sex difference in dyspnea. The post‐COVID group had no focal perfusion deficits but had higher mean pulmonary TTP (0.43 ± 0.04 vs. 0.41 ± 0.03, p = 0.011) and TTP ratio (0.096 ± 0.052 vs. 0.068 ± 0.027, p = 0.032). Post‐COVID males had the highest mean TTP of 0.47 ± 0.02 and TTP ratio of 0.160 ± 0.039 compared to male controls and post‐COVID females (p = 0.001 and p 
ISSN:0954-6820
1365-2796
1365-2796
DOI:10.1111/joim.13558