Familial autoimmunity in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Background Familial associations can be indicators of shared genetic susceptibility between two diseases. Previous data on familial autoimmunity in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are scarce and inconsistent. Objectives To investigate which autoimmune diseases (ADs) may share...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of internal medicine 2023-02, Vol.293 (2), p.200-211
Hauptverfasser: Che, Weng Ian, Westerlind, Helga, Lundberg, Ingrid E., Hellgren, Karin, Kuja‐Halkola, Ralf, Holmqvist, Marie E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Familial associations can be indicators of shared genetic susceptibility between two diseases. Previous data on familial autoimmunity in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are scarce and inconsistent. Objectives To investigate which autoimmune diseases (ADs) may share genetic susceptibility with IIM, we examined the familial associations between IIM and different ADs. Methods In this Swedish population‐based family study, we assembled 7615 first‐degree relatives (FDRs) of 1620 patients with IIM and 37,309 relatives of 7797 matched individuals without IIM. Via register linkages, we ascertained rheumatoid arthritis, other rheumatic inflammatory diseases (RIDs), multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), type 1 diabetes mellitus, autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD), coeliac disease (CeD) and myasthenia gravis among the FDRs. We estimated the familial association between IIM and each AD using conditional logistic regression and performed subgroup analyses by kinship. Results Patients with IIM had significantly higher odds of having ≥1 FDR affected by other RIDs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.78) and greater odds of having ≥2 FDRs affected by CeD (aOR = 3.57, 95% CI 1.28–9.92) compared to the individuals without IIM. In the analyses of any FDR pairs, we observed familial associations for other RIDs (aOR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.14–1.56), IBD (aOR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.02–1.41), AITD (aOR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.02–1.19) and CeD (aOR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.08–1.74) while associations for other ADs were not statistically significant. Conclusion The observed familial associations may suggest that IIM shares genetic susceptibility with various ADs, information that may be useful for clinical counselling and guiding future genetic studies of IIM.
ISSN:0954-6820
1365-2796
1365-2796
DOI:10.1111/joim.13573