Current clinical practice in the management of phyllodes tumors of the breast: an international cross-sectional study among surgeons and oncologists

Purpose Phyllodes tumors of the breast are rare fibroepithelial lesions that are classified as benign, borderline or malignant. There is little consensus on best practice for the work-up, management, and follow-up of patients with phyllodes tumors of the breast, and evidence-based guidelines are lac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2023-06, Vol.199 (2), p.293-304
Hauptverfasser: Sars, Carl, Sackey, Helena, Frisell, Jan, Dickman, Paul W., Karlsson, Fredrik, Kindts, Isabelle, Marta, Gustavo Nader, Freitas-Junior, Ruffo, Tvedskov, Tove Filtenborg, Kassem, Loay, Ali, Ahmed S., Ihalainen, Hanna, Neron, Mathias, Kontos, Michalis, Kaidar-Person, Orit, Meattini, Icro, Francken, Anne Brecht, van Duijnhoven, Frederieke, Moberg, Ingvild Ona, Marinko, Tanja, Kollar, Attila, Ahmed, Mahbubl, Remoundos, Dennis, Banks, Jenny, Jagsi, Reshma, Dossett, Lesly A., Lindqvist, Ebba K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Phyllodes tumors of the breast are rare fibroepithelial lesions that are classified as benign, borderline or malignant. There is little consensus on best practice for the work-up, management, and follow-up of patients with phyllodes tumors of the breast, and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of surgeons and oncologists with the aim to describe current clinical practice in the management of phyllodes tumors. The survey was constructed in REDCap and distributed between July 2021 and February 2022 through international collaborators in sixteen countries across four continents. Results A total of 419 responses were collected and analyzed. The majority of respondents were experienced and worked in a university hospital. Most agreed to recommend a tumor-free excision margin for benign tumors, increasing margins for borderline and malignant tumors. The multidisciplinary team meeting plays a major role in the treatment plan and follow-up. The vast majority did not consider axillary surgery. There were mixed opinions on adjuvant treatment, with a trend towards more liberal regiments in patients with locally advanced tumors. Most respondents preferred a five-year follow-up period for all phyllodes tumor types. Conclusions This study shows considerable variation in clinical practice managing phyllodes tumors. This suggests the potential for overtreatment of many patients and the need for education and further research targeting appropriate surgical margins, follow-up time and a multidisciplinary approach. There is a need to develop guidelines that recognize the heterogeneity of phyllodes tumors.
ISSN:0167-6806
1573-7217
1573-7217
DOI:10.1007/s10549-023-06896-1