Natural climate solutions

Better stewardship of land is needed to achieve the Paris Climate Agreement goal of holding warming to below 2 °C; however, confusion persists about the specific set of land stewardship options available and their mitigation potential. To address this, we identify and quantify “natural climate solut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2017-10, Vol.114 (44), p.11645-11650
Hauptverfasser: Griscom, Bronson W., Adams, Justin, Ellis, Peter W., Houghton, Richard A., Lomax, Guy, Miteva, Daniela A., Schlesinger, William H., Shoch, David, Siikamäki, Juha V., Smith, Pete, Woodbury, Peter, Zganjar, Chris, Blackman, Allen, Campari, João, Conant, Richard T., Delgado, Christopher, Elias, Patricia, Gopalakrishna, Trisha, Hamsik, Marisa R., Herrero, Mario, Kiesecker, Joseph, Landis, Emily, Laestadius, Lars, Leavitt, Sara M., Minnemeyer, Susan, Polasky, Stephen, Potapov, Peter, Putz, Francis E., Sanderman, Jonathan, Silvius, Marcel, Wollenberg, Eva, Fargione, Joseph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Better stewardship of land is needed to achieve the Paris Climate Agreement goal of holding warming to below 2 °C; however, confusion persists about the specific set of land stewardship options available and their mitigation potential. To address this, we identify and quantify “natural climate solutions” (NCS): 20 conservation, restoration, and improved land management actions that increase carbon storage and/or avoid greenhouse gas emissions across global forests, wetlands, grasslands, and agricultural lands. We find that the maximum potential of NCS—when constrained by food security, fiber security, and biodiversity conservation—is 23.8 petagrams of CO₂ equivalent (PgCO₂e)y−1 (95% CI 20.3–37.4). This is ≥30% higher than prior estimates, which did not include the full range of options and safeguards considered here. About half of this maximum (11.3 PgCO₂e y−1) represents cost-effective climate mitigation, assuming the social cost of CO₂ pollution is ≥100 USD MgCO₂e−1 by 2030. Natural climate solutions can provide 37% of cost-effective CO₂ mitigation needed through 2030 for a >66% chance of holding warming to below 2 °C. One-third of this cost-effective NCS mitigation can be delivered at or below 10 USD MgCO₂−1. Most NCS actions—if effectively implemented—also offer water filtration, flood buffering, soil health, biodiversity habitat, and enhanced climate resilience. Work remains to better constrain uncertainty of NCS mitigation estimates. Nevertheless, existing knowledge reported here provides a robust basis for immediate global action to improve ecosystem stewardship as a major solution to climate change.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1710465114