Assessing costs and benefits of improved soil quality management in remediation projects: A study of an urban site contaminated with PAH and metals

Contaminants in the soil may threaten soil functions (SFs) and, in turn, hinder the delivery of ecosystem services (ES). A framework for ecological risk assessments (ERAs) within the APPLICERA — APPLICable site-specific Environmental Risk Assessment research project promotes assessments that conside...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2020-03, Vol.707, p.135582-135582, Article 135582
Hauptverfasser: Volchko, Yevheniya, Berggren Kleja, Dan, Back, Pär-Erik, Tiberg, Charlotta, Enell, Anja, Larsson, Maria, Jones, Christopher M., Taylor, Astrid, Viketoft, Maria, Åberg, Annika, Dahlberg, Anna-Karin, Weiss, Jana, Wiberg, Karin, Rosén, Lars
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Contaminants in the soil may threaten soil functions (SFs) and, in turn, hinder the delivery of ecosystem services (ES). A framework for ecological risk assessments (ERAs) within the APPLICERA — APPLICable site-specific Environmental Risk Assessment research project promotes assessments that consider other soil quality parameters than only contaminant concentrations. The developed framework is: (i) able to differentiate the effects of contamination on SFs from the effects of other soil qualities essential for soil biota; and (ii) provides a robust basis for improved soil quality management in remediation projects. This study evaluates the socio-economic consequences of remediation alternatives stemming from a Tier 1 ERA that focusses on total contaminant concentrations and soil quality standards and a detailed, site-specific Tier 3 Triad approach that is based on the APPLICERA framework. The present study demonstrates how Tier 1 and Tier 3 ERAs differ in terms of the socio-economic consequences of their remediation actions, as well as presents a novel method for the semi-quantitative assessment of on-site ES. Although the presented Tier 3 ERA is more expensive and time-consuming than the more traditional Tier 1 ERA approach, it has the potential to lower the costs of remediation actions, decrease greenhouse gas emissions, reduce other environmental impacts, and minimise socio-economic losses. Furthermore, the remediation actions stemming from the Tier 3 ERA were predicted to exert far less negative ES effects than the actions proposed based on the results of the Tier 1 ERA. [Display omitted] •A framework for detailed ecological risk assessment (ERA) was elaborated.•A procedure for mapping of ecosystem services was developed.•The socio-economic consequences of the different ERA approaches were evaluated.•Tier 3 ERA was associated with the less social loss than Tier 1 ERA.•Tier 3 ERA leads to lower cost of action and lower air emissions.
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135582