Confusion remains an important issue in public goods game experiments
The article “Confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior in public goods games” by Wang et al. (1) is based on two experiments that modify and replicate Burton-Chellew, El Mouden & West (BEW) (2). Wang et al. implement a pregame quiz about the game’s incentives sometimes used in the literature...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2024-08, Vol.121 (32), p.e2411093121 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The article “Confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior in public goods games” by Wang et al. (1) is based on two experiments that modify and replicate Burton-Chellew, El Mouden & West (BEW) (2). Wang et al. implement a pregame quiz about the game’s incentives sometimes used in the literature (3), but in contrast to BEW, subjects cannot proceed until they have answered the questions correctly. After this quiz, Wang et al. measure comprehension and report that only 2.5% (Study 1) to 4% (Study 2) misunderstand the game. They argue that their findings undermine BEW’s conclusion, suggesting that confusion is not an important factor in explaining cooperative behavior. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.2411093121 |