Confusion remains an important issue in public goods game experiments

The article “Confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior in public goods games” by Wang et al. (1) is based on two experiments that modify and replicate Burton-Chellew, El Mouden & West (BEW) (2). Wang et al. implement a pregame quiz about the game’s incentives sometimes used in the literature...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2024-08, Vol.121 (32), p.e2411093121
Hauptverfasser: Strømland, Eirik, Koppel, Lina, Johannesson, Magnus, Tinghög, Gustav
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The article “Confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior in public goods games” by Wang et al. (1) is based on two experiments that modify and replicate Burton-Chellew, El Mouden & West (BEW) (2). Wang et al. implement a pregame quiz about the game’s incentives sometimes used in the literature (3), but in contrast to BEW, subjects cannot proceed until they have answered the questions correctly. After this quiz, Wang et al. measure comprehension and report that only 2.5% (Study 1) to 4% (Study 2) misunderstand the game. They argue that their findings undermine BEW’s conclusion, suggesting that confusion is not an important factor in explaining cooperative behavior.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2411093121