Sertraline Treatment of Major Depression in Patients With Acute MI or Unstable Angina
CONTEXT Major depressive disorder (MDD) occurs in 15% to 23% of patients with acute coronary syndromes and constitutes an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality. However, no published evidence exists that antidepressant drugs are safe or efficacious in patients with unstable ischemic he...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2002-08, Vol.288 (6), p.701-709 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT Major depressive disorder (MDD) occurs in 15% to 23% of patients with
acute coronary syndromes and constitutes an independent risk factor for morbidity
and mortality. However, no published evidence exists that antidepressant drugs
are safe or efficacious in patients with unstable ischemic heart disease. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sertraline treatment of MDD in
patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina
and free of other life-threatening medical conditions. DESIGN AND SETTING Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 40 outpatient
cardiology centers and psychiatry clinics in the United States, Europe, Canada,
and Australia. Enrollment began in April 1997 and follow-up ended in April
2001. PATIENTS A total of 369 patients with MDD (64% male; mean age, 57.1 years; mean
17-item Hamilton Depression [HAM-D] score, 19.6; MI, 74%; unstable angina,
26%). INTERVENTION After a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in, patients were randomly assigned
to receive sertraline in flexible dosages of 50 to 200 mg/d (n = 186) or placebo
(n = 183) for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary (safety) outcome measure was change from baseline in left
ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); secondary measures included surrogate
cardiac measures and cardiovascular adverse events, as well as scores on the
HAM-D scale and Clinical Global Impression Improvement scale (CGI-I) in the
total randomized sample, in a group with any prior history of MDD, and in
a more severe MDD subgroup defined a priori by a HAM-D score of at least 18
and history of 2 or more prior episodes of MDD. RESULTS Sertraline had no significant effect on mean (SD) LVEF (sertraline:
baseline, 54% [10%]; week 16, 54% [11%]; placebo: baseline, 52% [13%]; week
16, 53% [13%]), treatment-emergent increase in ventricular premature complex
(VPC) runs (sertraline: 13.1%; placebo: 12.9%), QTc interval greater than
450 milliseconds at end point (sertraline: 12%; placebo: 13%), or other cardiac
measures. All comparisons were statistically nonsignificant (P≥.05). The incidence of severe cardiovascular adverse events was
14.5% with sertraline and 22.4% with placebo. In the total randomized sample,
the CGI-I (P = .049), but not the HAM-D (P = .14), favored sertraline. The CGI-I responder rates for sertraline
were significantly higher than for placebo in the total sample (67% vs 53%; P = .01), in the group with at least 1 prior episode of
depression |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.288.6.701 |