Validation of a breast cancer assay for radiotherapy omission: an individual participant data meta-analysis

There are currently no molecular tests to identify individual breast cancers where radiotherapy (RT) offers no benefit. Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) is a 16-gene molecular signature developed to identify low risk cancers where RT will not further reduce recurrence...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2024-10
Hauptverfasser: Karlsson, Per, Fyles, Anthony, Chang, S Laura, Arrick, Bradley, Baehner, Frederick L, Malmström, Per, Fernö, Mårtin, Holmberg, Erik, Sjöström, Martin, Liu, Fei-Fei, Cameron, David A, Williams, Linda J, Bartlett, John Ms, Dunlop, Joanna, Caldwell, Jacqueline, Loane, Joseph F, Mallon, Elizabeth, Piper, Tammy, Kunkler, Ian, Feng, Felix Y, Speers, Corey W, Pierce, Lori J, Bennett, John P, Taylor, Karen J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There are currently no molecular tests to identify individual breast cancers where radiotherapy (RT) offers no benefit. Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) is a 16-gene molecular signature developed to identify low risk cancers where RT will not further reduce recurrence rates. An individual participant data meta-analysis was performed in 623 cases of node-negative ER+/HER2-negative early breast cancer enrolled in three RT randomized trials for whom primary tumor material was available for analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model on time to locoregional recurrence (LRR) was used to test the interaction between POLAR score and RT. 429 (69%) patients' tumors had a high POLAR score and 194 (31%) had a low score. Patients with high POLAR score had, in the absence of RT, a 10-year cumulative incidence of LRR: 20% (15%-26%) vs 5% (2%-11%) for those with a low score. Patients with a high POLAR score had a large benefit from RT (hazard ratio [HR] for RT vs no RT: 0.37 [0.23-0.60], p 
ISSN:0027-8874
1460-2105
1460-2105
DOI:10.1093/jnci/djae262