A multidisciplinary team and patient perspective on omission of surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for early breast cancer: A European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO) Research Academy survey

Surgical de-escalation aims to reduce morbidity without compromising oncological outcomes. Trials to de-escalate breast cancer (BC) surgery among exceptional responders after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are ongoing. Combined patient and clinician insights on this strategy are unknown. The Eur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of surgical oncology 2024-10, Vol.50 (10), p.108585, Article 108585
Hauptverfasser: Caballero, Carmela, Lundon, Dara J., Vasileva-Slaveva, Mariela, Montagna, Giacomo, Bonci, Eduard-Alexandru, Brandl, Andreas, Smith, Henry, Kok, Johnn Henry Herrera, Holmberg, Carl-Jacob, Sayyed, Raza, Santrac, Nada, Suppan, Ina, Kaul, Pallvi, Vassos, Nikolaos, Lorenzon, Laura, Murphy, Marlena, Ceelen, Wim, de Azambuja, Evandro, McIntosh, Stuart A., Rubio, Isabel T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Surgical de-escalation aims to reduce morbidity without compromising oncological outcomes. Trials to de-escalate breast cancer (BC) surgery among exceptional responders after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) are ongoing. Combined patient and clinician insights on this strategy are unknown. The European Society of Surgical Oncology Young Surgeons Alumni Club (EYSAC) performed an online survey to evaluate the perspective of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) on omission of surgery (“no surgery”) following complete response to NST for early BC. The aim was to identify MDT considerations and perceived barriers to omission of BC surgery. Patient insights were obtained through a focused group discussion (FGD) with four members of the patient advocacy group, Guiding Researchers and Advocates to Scientific Partnerships (GRASP). The MDT survey had 248 responses, with 229 included for analysis. Criteria for a “no surgery” approach included: patient's tumor and nodal status before (39.7 %) and after (45.9 %) NST and comorbidities (44.3 %). The majority chose standard surgery for hypothetical cases with a complete response to NST. Barriers for implementation were lack of definitive trials (55.9 %), “no surgery” not being discussed in MDTs (28.8 %) and lack of essential diagnostic or therapeutic options (24 %). Patients expressed communication gaps about BC surgery, lack of trust regarding accuracy of imaging, fear of regret and psychosocial burden of choosing less extensive surgery. Before accepting “no surgery” after complete response to NST, MDTs and patients need level 1 evidence from clinical trials, access to standard diagnostic modalities and treatments. Patient's fear of regretting less surgery need to be acknowledged and addressed. •Surgical de-escalation trials in primary breast cancer are ongoing. Some of these are investigating the efficacy and safety of completely omitting BC surgery among patients with exceptional response to NST at the early-stage setting.•The MDT and patient survey conducted by ESSO-EYSAC, showed that clinicians and patients have hesitation towards completely omitting BC surgery. Lack of definitive trials, the option to omit surgery not being discussed during MDT meetings and lack of essential diagnostic or therapeutic options, were barriers to safe omission of surgery. Patients expressed fear of regret, communication gaps about BC surgery and lack of trust in the accuracy of imaging as reasons for not being receptive to this strategy.•Fu
ISSN:0748-7983
1532-2157
1532-2157
DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108585