A systems-based analysis to rethink the European environmental risk assessment of regulated chemicals using pesticides as a pilot case

A growing body of scientific literature stresses the need to advance current environmental risk assessment (ERA) methodologies and associated regulatory frameworks to better address the landscape-scale and long-term impact of pesticide use on biodiversity and the ecosystem. Moreover, more collaborat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2024-10, Vol.948, p.174526, Article 174526
Hauptverfasser: Axelman, Johan, Aldrich, Annette, Duquesne, Sabine, Backhaus, Thomas, Brendel, Stephan, Focks, Andreas, Holz, Sheila, Knillmann, Saskia, Pieper, Silvia, Silva, Emilia, Schmied-Tobies, Maria, Topping, Christopher John, Wipfler, Louise, Williams, James, Sousa, José Paulo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A growing body of scientific literature stresses the need to advance current environmental risk assessment (ERA) methodologies and associated regulatory frameworks to better address the landscape-scale and long-term impact of pesticide use on biodiversity and the ecosystem. Moreover, more collaborative and integrative approaches are needed to meet sustainability goals. The One Health approach is increasingly applied by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to support the transition towards safer, healthier and more sustainable food. To this end, EFSA commissioned the development of a roadmap for action to establish a European Partnership for next-generation, systems-based Environmental Risk Assessment (PERA). Here, we summarise the main conclusions and recommendations reported in the 2022 PERA Roadmap. This roadmap highlights that fragmentation of data, knowledge and expertise across regulatory sectors results in suboptimal processes and hinders the implementation of integrative ERA approaches needed to better protect the environment. To advance ERA, we revisited the underlying assumptions of the current ERA paradigm; that chemical risks are generally assessed and managed in isolation with a substance-by-substance, realistic worst-case and tiered approach. We suggest optimising the use of the vast amount of information and expertise available with pesticides as a pilot area. It is recommended to as soon as possible adopt a systems-based approach, i.e. within the current regulatory framework, to spark a step-wise transition towards an ERA framed at a system level of ecological and societal relevance. Tangible systems-based and integrative steps are available. For instance, the rich sources of existing data for prospective and retrospective ERA of pesticides could be used to reality-benchmark existing and new ERA methods. To achieve these goals, collaboration among stakeholders across scientific disciplines and regulatory sectors must be strengthened. [Display omitted] •A systems-based analysis of environmental risk assessment (ERA) was undertaken to address calls for advancing pesticide ERA.•Efficiency of ERA was found to be hampered by fragmentation of data and knowledge, between as well as within sectors.•Proposed underlying drivers for fragmentation are a historically fragmented regulatory landscape and the current ERA paradigm.•Research questions are proposed to reframe the current ERA paradigm to step-wise expand its applicability and efficiency.•A
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174526