Outcome Measures for Disease-Modifying Trials in Parkinson’s Disease: Consensus Paper by the EJS ACT-PD Multi-Arm Multi-Stage Trial Initiative

Background: Multi-arm, multi-stage (MAMS) platform trials can accelerate the identification of disease-modifying treatments for Parkinson’s disease (PD) but there is no current consensus on the optimal outcome measures (OM) for this approach. Objective: To provide an up-to-date inventory of OM for d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Parkinson's disease 2023-01, Vol.13 (6), p.1011-1033
Hauptverfasser: Gonzalez-Robles, Cristina, Weil, Rimona S., van Wamelen, Daniel, Bartlett, Michèle, Burnell, Matthew, Clarke, Caroline S., Hu, Michele T., Huxford, Brook, Jha, Ashwani, Lambert, Christian, Lawton, Michael, Mills, Georgia, Noyce, Alastair, Piccini, Paola, Pushparatnam, Kuhan, Rochester, Lynn, Siu, Carroll, Williams-Gray, Caroline H., Zeissler, Marie-Louise, Zetterberg, Henrik, Carroll, Camille B., Foltynie, Thomas, Schrag, Anette
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Multi-arm, multi-stage (MAMS) platform trials can accelerate the identification of disease-modifying treatments for Parkinson’s disease (PD) but there is no current consensus on the optimal outcome measures (OM) for this approach. Objective: To provide an up-to-date inventory of OM for disease-modifying PD trials, and a framework for future selection of OM for such trials. Methods: As part of the Edmond J Safra Accelerating Clinical Trials in Parkinson Disease (EJS ACT-PD) initiative, an expert group with Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) representatives’ input reviewed and evaluated available evidence on OM for potential use in trials to delay progression of PD. Each OM was ranked based on aspects such as validity, sensitivity to change, participant burden and practicality for a multi-site trial. Review of evidence and expert opinion led to the present inventory. Results: An extensive inventory of OM was created, divided into: general, motor and non-motor scales, diaries and fluctuation questionnaires, cognitive, disability and health-related quality of life, capability, quantitative motor, wearable and digital, combined, resource use, imaging and wet biomarkers, and milestone-based. A framework for evaluation of OM is presented to update the inventory in the future. PPIE input highlighted the need for OM which reflect their experience of disease progression and are applicable to diverse populations and disease stages. Conclusion: We present a range of OM, classified according to a transparent framework, to aid selection of OM for disease-modifying PD trials, whilst allowing for inclusion or re-classification of relevant OM as new evidence emerges.
ISSN:1877-7171
1877-718X
1877-718X
DOI:10.3233/JPD-230051