High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable

Failures to replicate evidence of new discoveries have forced scientists to ask whether this unreliability is due to suboptimal implementation of methods or whether presumptively optimal methods are not, in fact, optimal. This paper reports an investigation by four coordinated laboratories of the pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature human behaviour 2024-02, Vol.8 (2), p.311-319
Hauptverfasser: Protzko, John, Krosnick, Jon, Nelson, Leif, Nosek, Brian A, Axt, Jordan, Berent, Matt, Buttrick, Nicholas, DeBell, Matthew, Ebersole, Charles R, Lundmark, Sebastian, MacInnis, Bo, O'Donnell, Michael, Perfecto, Hannah, Pustejovsky, James E, Roeder, Scott S, Walleczek, Jan, Schooler, Jonathan W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Failures to replicate evidence of new discoveries have forced scientists to ask whether this unreliability is due to suboptimal implementation of methods or whether presumptively optimal methods are not, in fact, optimal. This paper reports an investigation by four coordinated laboratories of the prospective replicability of 16 novel experimental findings using rigour-enhancing practices: confirmatory tests, large sample sizes, preregistration and methodological transparency. In contrast to past systematic replication efforts that reported replication rates averaging 50%, replication attempts here produced the expected effects with significance testing (P 
ISSN:2397-3374
2397-3374
DOI:10.1038/s41562-023-01749-9