Surface decontamination of explanted peri‐implantitis‐affected implants

Aim The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of air‐polishing (AP) and a combination of AP and alkaline electrolysed water (AEW) in surface decontamination of explanted peri‐implantitis‐affected implants. Materials and Methods Twenty‐five patients with 34 dental implants scheduled for explan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical periodontology 2023-08, Vol.50 (8), p.1113-1122
Hauptverfasser: Ichioka, Yuki, Derks, Jan, Larsson, Lena, Berglundh, Tord
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of air‐polishing (AP) and a combination of AP and alkaline electrolysed water (AEW) in surface decontamination of explanted peri‐implantitis‐affected implants. Materials and Methods Twenty‐five patients with 34 dental implants scheduled for explantation due to severe peri‐implantitis were included. Following implant removal, the apical part of each implant was embedded in acrylic blocks. Implants were randomly allocated to surface decontamination using AP with or without AEW. Four implants were left untreated and used as negative controls. Specimens were analysed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy‐dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy (EDS). Area of residual bacteria was the primary outcome. Results SEM analysis revealed that both treatment protocols were effective in biofilm removal and only small proportions of target areas of the implants showed residual bacterial or mineralized deposits. Although differences between the treatment protocols were small, implant thread loci (top/flank/valley), zones of the implant (apical/middle/coronal), implant surface characteristics and gender influenced the results. In addition, EDS analysis showed that zones influenced the atomic% of carbon and calcium and that implant surface characteristics affected the atomic% of titanium. Conclusions AP, with or without AEW, is an effective method in removing biofilm from peri‐implantitis‐affected implants.
ISSN:0303-6979
1600-051X
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13836