Effects of bolus injection duration on perfusion estimates in dynamic CT and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI
Estimates of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and tissue mean transit time (MTT) have been shown to differ between dynamic CT perfusion (CTP) and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI). This study investigates whether these discrepancies regarding CBF and MTT between CTP and DSC-MRI can be attribute...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Magma (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-02, Vol.36 (1), p.95-106 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Estimates of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and tissue mean transit time (MTT) have been shown to differ between dynamic CT perfusion (CTP) and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI). This study investigates whether these discrepancies regarding CBF and MTT between CTP and DSC-MRI can be attributed to the different injection durations of these techniques. Five subjects were scanned using CTP and DSC-MRI. Region-wise estimates of CBF, MTT, and cerebral blood volume (CBV) were derived based on oscillatory index regularized singular value decomposition. A parametric model that reproduced the shape of measured time curves and characteristics of resulting perfusion parameter estimates was developed and used to simulate data with injection durations typical for CTP and DSC-MRI for a clinically relevant set of perfusion scenarios and noise levels. In simulations, estimates of CBF/MTT showed larger negative/positive bias and increasing variability for CTP when compared to DSC-MRI, especially for high CBF levels. While noise also affected estimates, at clinically relevant levels, the injection duration effect was larger. There are several methodological differences between CTP and DSC-MRI. The results of this study suggest that the injection duration is among those that can explain differences in estimates of CBF and MTT between these bolus tracking techniques. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1352-8661 0968-5243 1352-8661 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10334-022-01038-y |