Implant vs abutment level connection in implant supported screw‐retained fixed partial dentures with cobalt‐chrome framework: 1‐year interim results of a randomized clinical study
Background Screw‐retained fixed partial dentures (FPD) have shown a lower incidence of biologic complications and an easier retrievability compared with cemented FPD. Purpose To compare the marginal bone loss at conical connection implant restored with a screw retained cobalt‐chrome FPD in an implan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2019-04, Vol.21 (2), p.238-246 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Screw‐retained fixed partial dentures (FPD) have shown a lower incidence of biologic complications and an easier retrievability compared with cemented FPD.
Purpose
To compare the marginal bone loss at conical connection implant restored with a screw retained cobalt‐chrome FPD in an implant‐level (IL) or an abutment‐level (AL) setup.
Materials and Methods
Patients with at least two adjacent missing teeth were randomly allocated to be restored with IL or AL FPD. Periapical radiographs and clinical examination were taken at implant placement, prosthetic connection, 6 and 12 months to evaluate marginal bone loss (MBL), and soft tissue conditions. Complications were used to calculate prognostic indexes.
Results
Fifty patients were treated with 50 FPD supported by 119 implants. The difference of MBL between the IL and AL groups was statistically significant (P = 0.003). At 1 year, MBL was 0.086 ± 0.313 mm and 0.005 ± 0.222 mm in the IL and AL groups, respectively. The presence of BoP increased with time in IL, whereas it decreased in AL group (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1523-0899 1708-8208 1708-8208 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cid.12717 |