Technical complications following implant‐supported restorative therapy performed in Sweden
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and consequences of technical complications in implant‐supported restorative therapy. Material & Methods The occurrence and consequences of technical complications in implant‐supported restorative therapy over a mean follow‐up period...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2018-06, Vol.29 (6), p.603-611 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and consequences of technical complications in implant‐supported restorative therapy.
Material & Methods
The occurrence and consequences of technical complications in implant‐supported restorative therapy over a mean follow‐up period of 5.3 years were assessed based on documentation in files from 2,666 patients. Risk indicators were identified by the use of survival models, considering repeated events. Results were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) including 95% confidence intervals.
Results
Technical complications occurred in 24.8% of the patients. Chipping and loss of retention were the most common, affecting 11.0% and 7.9% of supraconstructions, respectively, while implant‐related complications (e.g., implant fracture) were rare. More than 50% of the affected patients experienced technical complications more than once and almost all reported complications led to interventions by a dental professional. The extent of the supraconstruction was the strongest risk indicator for both chipping (HR 3).
Conclusion
Over a 5‐year period, technical complications in implant‐supported restorative therapy occurred frequently and their management required professional intervention. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0905-7161 1600-0501 1600-0501 |
DOI: | 10.1111/clr.13271 |