Nepotism and sexism in peer-review

Nepotism and sexism in peer-review

In the first-ever analysis of peer-review scores for postdoctoral fellowship applications, the system is revealed as being riddled with prejudice. The policy of secrecy in evaluation must be abandoned.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature (London) 1997-05, Vol.387 (6631), p.341-343
Hauptverfasser: Wennerås, Christine, Wold, Agnes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Bibliometrics
commentary
Conflict of Interest
Fellowships and Scholarships
Fellowships and Scholarships - standards
Gender Studies
Genusstudier
Humanities and Social Sciences
Medical research
multidisciplinary
Nepotism
Peer Review
Peer Review, Research - standards
Prejudice
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi)
Publishing
Regression Analysis
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Scientists
Sex discrimination
Sociologi (exklusive socialt arbete, socialpsykologi och socialantropologi)
Sociology (excluding Social work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Sweden
Truth Disclosure
Women
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the first-ever analysis of peer-review scores for postdoctoral fellowship applications, the system is revealed as being riddled with prejudice. The policy of secrecy in evaluation must be abandoned.
ISSN:0028-0836
1476-4687
DOI:10.1038/387341a0