A Prospective Comparison of Duplex Ultrasonography, Captopril Renography, MRA, and CTA in Assessing Renal Artery Stenosis

Purpose: To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of duplex ultrasonography, captopril renography, computed tomography angiography (CTA), and 3D Gd magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in diagnosing hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (RAS). Material and Methods: The standard o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta radiologica (1987) 2006-10, Vol.47 (8), p.764-774
Hauptverfasser: Eklöf, H., Ahlström, H., Magnusson, A., Andersson, L.-G., Andrén, B., Hägg, A., Bergqvist, D., Nyman, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of duplex ultrasonography, captopril renography, computed tomography angiography (CTA), and 3D Gd magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in diagnosing hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (RAS). Material and Methods: The standard of reference was measurement of transstenotic pressure gradient. Fifty-eight hypertensive patients with suspicion of RAS were evaluated, when possible, by all five techniques. Sensitivity and specificity to detect RAS were compared for each technique on both a patient and kidney basis. Discrepancies were evaluated separately and classified as borderline, method dependent, or operator dependent. Results: The prevalence of RAS was 77%. The sensitivity specificity of ultrasonography, captopril renography, CTA, and MRA in detecting kidneys with RAS was 73 71%, 52 63%, 94 62%, and 93 91%, respectively. Ultrasonography had a significantly lower sensitivity than CTA and MRA (P
ISSN:0284-1851
1600-0455
1600-0455
DOI:10.1080/02841850600849092