Are international differences in the outcomes of acute coronary syndromes apparent or real? A multilevel analysis

Study objective: International variation in the outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has been well reported. The relative contributions of patient, hospital, and country level factors on clinical outcomes, however, remain unclear, and thus, was the objective of this study. Design...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2005-05, Vol.59 (5), p.427-433
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Wei-Ching, Midodzi, William K, Westerhout, Cynthia M, Boersma, Eric, Cooper, Judith, Barnathan, Elliot S, Simoons, Maarten L, Wallentin, Lars, Ohman, E Magnus, Armstrong, Paul W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Study objective: International variation in the outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has been well reported. The relative contributions of patient, hospital, and country level factors on clinical outcomes, however, remain unclear, and thus, was the objective of this study. Design: Multilevel logistic regression models were developed for death/(re)infarction (MI) at 30 days and death in one year, with patients (1st level) nested in hospitals (2nd level) and hospitals in countries (3rd level). Settings: The GUSTO IV ACS clinical trial was carried out at 458 hospital sites in 24 countries. Patients: 7800 non-ST segment elevation (NSTE) ACS patients. Main results: There were substantial variations among countries in the processes and outcomes of care at 30 days, ranging from 5.4% to 50.0% for percutaneous coronary intervention, 4.3% to 21.2% for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 5.0% to 13.9% for 30 day death/(re)MI, and 4.9% to 14.8% for one year mortality. However, the residual inter-country variations in 30 day death/(re)MI and one year mortality became non-significant and nearly disappeared (p>0.500 for both) after adjusting for key baseline patient characteristics and hospital factors, which became significant (p
ISSN:0143-005X
1470-2738
DOI:10.1136/jech.2004.024984