Multicentre study of detection and false-negative rates in sentinel nodebiopsy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy has recently evolved as a means of staging the axilla in breast cancer with minimal surgical trauma. The aim of this prospective multicentre study was to identify factors that influenced the detection and false-negative rates during the learning phase. METHODS: Data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of surgery 2001, Vol.88 (12), p.1644
Hauptverfasser: Bergkvist, L, Frisell, J, Liljegren, G, Celebioglu, F, Damm, S, Thörn, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: Sentinel node biopsy has recently evolved as a means of staging the axilla in breast cancer with minimal surgical trauma. The aim of this prospective multicentre study was to identify factors that influenced the detection and false-negative rates during the learning phase. METHODS: Data on all 498 sentinel node biopsies performed between August 1997 and December 1999 in Sweden were collected. RESULTS: A sentinel node was found in 450 patients (90 per cent). Preoperative scintigraphy visualized 83 per cent of all sentinel nodes. The detection rate was higher with same-day injection of tracer than with injection the day before (96 versus 86 per cent; P < 0.01). Dye injected less than 5 min or more than 30 min before the start of the operation lowered the detection rate (less than 60 per cent versus more than 65 per cent; P = 0.02). The detection rate varied from 61 to 100 per cent between surgeons. The false-negative rate was 11 per cent. The presence of multiple tumour foci and a high S-phase fraction increased the risk of a false-negative sentinel node, whereas the number of operations performed by each surgeon was less important. CONCLUSION: Training of the individual surgeon influenced the detection rate, as did timing of tracer and dye injection. The false-negative rate seemed to be related to biological factors.
ISSN:1365-2168
0007-1323
DOI:10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01948.x