The Importance of Doppler Angle of Insonation on Differentiation Between 50–69% and 70–99% Carotid Artery Stenosis
Aim to investigate the importance of Doppler angle differentiating between 50–69% and ≥70% internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Material and methods fifty-one patients with a previous diagnosis of 50–69% ICA stenosis (n =53) were re-evaluated by duplex scanning. Spectral Doppler velocity waveform...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2001-04, Vol.21 (4), p.311-313 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim to investigate the importance of Doppler angle differentiating between 50–69% and ≥70% internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Material and methods fifty-one patients with a previous diagnosis of 50–69% ICA stenosis (n =53) were re-evaluated by duplex scanning. Spectral Doppler velocity waveforms were obtained from common carotid (CCA), ICA and external (ECA) carotid arteries with the same Doppler angle of insonation as used at the initial duplex scanning, followed by repeated measurements with a fixed 60° angle of insonation.Results the peak systolic velocity (PSV) in the ICA was 181±55 cm/s (mean±SD) at the second duplex scanning when the same angle of insonation (mean 46°±9) was used as during the initial investigation. When the examination was done with a 60° angle of insonation, PSV ICA was 261±96 cm/s (mean±SD). In fifteen arteries the estimated degree of ICA stenosis changed from 50–69% to 70–99% due to the application of a fixed Doppler angle of insonation at 60°. Conclusion the Doppler angle of insonation has a significant effect on spectral Doppler velocity measurements. It is crucial that duplex criteria are standardised with a fixed angle of insonation and that this angle is consistently used during velocity estimations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-5884 1532-2165 1532-2165 |
DOI: | 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1331 |