Health Status and Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults With Chronic Coronary Disease
Whether initial invasive management in older vs younger adults with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia improves health status or clinical outcomes is unknown. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of age on health status and clinical outcomes with invasive vs conserv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2023-05, Vol.81 (17), p.1697-1709 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Whether initial invasive management in older vs younger adults with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia improves health status or clinical outcomes is unknown.
The goal of this study was to examine the impact of age on health status and clinical outcomes with invasive vs conservative management in the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial.
One-year angina-specific health status was assessed with the 7-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) (score range 0-100; higher scores indicate better health status). Cox proportional hazards models estimated the treatment effect of invasive vs conservative management as a function of age on the composite clinical outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for resuscitated cardiac arrest, unstable angina, or heart failure.
Among 4,617 participants, 2,239 (48.5%) were aged |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0735-1097 1558-3597 1558-3597 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.048 |