Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma in children, adolescents, and young adults. An analysis of three prospective studies of the Cooperative Weichteilsarkomstudiengruppe (CWS)

Background We have analyzed the outcome of patients with localized extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma (EES) treated in three consecutive Cooperative Weichteilsarkomstudiengruppe (CWS) soft tissue sarcoma (STS) studies: CWS‐91, CWS‐96, and CWS‐2002P. Methods Patients were treated in CWS‐91 with four‐ (vincristine, dactinomycin, doxorubicin, and ifosfamide [VAIA] or cyclophosphamide [VACA II]) or five‐drug (+etoposide [EVAIA]) cycles, in CWS‐96 they were randomly assigned to receive VAIA or CEVAIE (+carboplatin and etoposide), and in CWS‐2002P with VAIA III plus optional maintenance therapy (MT) with cyclophosphamide and vinblastine. Local therapy consisted of resection and/or radiotherapy (RT). Results Two hundred forty‐three patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The 5‐year event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57–69) and 73% (95% CI 67–79), respectively. The 5‐year EFS by study was 64% (95% CI 54–74) in CWS‐91, 57% (95% CI 48–66) in CWS‐96, and 79% (95% CI 67–91) in CWS‐2002P (n.s.). The 5‐year OS was 72% (95% CI 62–82) in CWS‐91, 70% (95% CI 61–79) in CWS‐96, and 86% (95% CI 76–96) in CWS‐2002P (n.s.). In CWS‐96, 5‐year EFS and OS in the VAIA arm versus the CEVAIE were 65% (95% CI 52–81) versus 55% (95% CI 39–76) log‐rank p = .13, and 85% (95% CI 75–96) versus 61% (95% CI 45–82), log‐rank p = .09. Conclusion Our analysis provides interesting information on the treatment and specificities of EES, which can be useful for a better understanding of this rare entity and should be considered in the development of future clinical trials for Ewing sarcoma defined as FET–ETS fusion positive tumors.