Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC
Background KRAS and BRAF mutations are prognostic and predictive tools in metastatic colorectal cancer, but little is known about their prognostic value in patients scheduled for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Therefore, we analyzed the prognostic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2020-01, Vol.27 (1), p.293-300 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
KRAS
and
BRAF
mutations are prognostic and predictive tools in metastatic colorectal cancer, but little is known about their prognostic value in patients scheduled for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Therefore, we analyzed the prognostic impact of
KRAS
and
BRAF
mutations in patients with peritoneal metastases scheduled for CRS and HIPEC.
Patients and Methods
In a consecutive series of 399 patients scheduled for CRS and HIPEC between 2009 and 2017, 111 subjects with peritoneal metastases from primaries of the appendix, colon, or rectum were analyzed for
KRAS
mutation and 92 for
BRAF
mutation.
Results
Mutation in
KRAS
was present in 51/111 (46%), and mutated
BRAF
was found in 10/92 (11%). There was no difference in overall survival between
KRAS
mutation tumors and
KRAS
wild type, whereas
BRAF
mutation was associated with short survival. No subject with
BRAF
mutation survived 2 years. On multivariate analysis, completeness of cytoreduction score (CCS,
p
= 0.000001), presence of signet cell differentiation (
p
= 0.000001), and
BRAF
mutation (
p
= 0.0021) were linked with poor prognosis.
Conclusions
BRAF
mutation is a marker of poor prognosis in patients with appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal metastases scheduled for CRS and HIPEC, whereas survival outcome in subjects with mutated
KRAS
does not differ from wild-type
KRAS
. This finding suggests that those with
BRAF
mutation should be considered for alternative treatment options. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1068-9265 1534-4681 1534-4681 |
DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-019-07452-2 |