Relative efficacy and safety of ticagelor vs clopidogrel as a function of time to invasive management in non–ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the PLATO trial

Background Guidelines suggest that “upstream” P2Y12 receptor antagonists should be considered in patients with non–ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE‐ACS). Hypothesis Early use of ticagrelor in patients managed with an invasive strategy would be more effective than clopidogrel becau...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) N.J.), 2017-06, Vol.40 (6), p.390-398
Hauptverfasser: Pollack, Charles V., Davoudi, Farideh, Diercks, Deborah B., Becker, Richard C., James, Stefan K., Lim, Soo Teik, Schulte, Phillip J., Spinar, Jindrich, Steg, Philippe Gabriel, Storey, Robert F., Himmelmann, Anders, Wallentin, Lars, Cannon, Christopher P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Guidelines suggest that “upstream” P2Y12 receptor antagonists should be considered in patients with non–ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE‐ACS). Hypothesis Early use of ticagrelor in patients managed with an invasive strategy would be more effective than clopidogrel because of its more rapid onset of action and greater potency. Methods In the PLATO trial, 6792 NSTE‐ACS patients were randomized to ticagrelor or clopidogrel (started prior to angiography) and underwent angiography within 72 hours of randomization. We compared efficacy and safety outcomes of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel as a function of “early” (
ISSN:0160-9289
1932-8737
1932-8737
DOI:10.1002/clc.22733